AI Scout Daily
News

Goldman Sachs Pulls Claude Code and GitHub's AI Tools From Bankers and Traders, Keeps Them for 12,000 Engineers

Bloomberg's 2 November report says October guidance narrowed access to the advanced coding tools. The move reverses the bank's July enthusiasm for non-technical staff vibe coding, and the sources disagree on exactly which GitHub product is covered.

Priya Nair·November 9, 2026·4 min read

TL;DR

Goldman Sachs has restricted Anthropic's Claude Code and GitHub's AI coding tools to its engineers, pulling them from most bankers and traders, according to Bloomberg's report on 2 November. Internal guidance updated in October followed a review of productivity and risk. Strats, who combine engineering and quantitative work, keep access. It reverses the bank's July stance, when its chief information officer praised vibe coding by non-technical staff, and follows an earlier block on Claude for Hong Kong bankers.

Goldman Sachs has narrowed who can use advanced AI coding tools. Bloomberg reported on 2 November that internal guidance updated in October limits Anthropic's Claude Code and GitHub's tools to engineers, after the bank had let bankers and traders use them for months. We couldn't read Bloomberg's original, which is paywalled, so the details below come from two outlets summarising it.

What changed

GroupAccess nowDetail reported
Engineers (about 12,000)Keep accessDescribed as the people "best suited to leverage" the tools long term, in the spokesperson's words
Strats (engineering plus quant work)Keep accessExempt from the restriction
Most bankers and tradersRemovedHad used the tools to monitor client trading flows, simulate market moves and positions, and draft text and visuals
As summarised from Bloomberg by Dealroom News and AI Weekly. Neither summary gives a headcount for how many people lost access.

What Goldman said

Spokesperson Nick Carcaterra told Bloomberg the bank runs a period of experimentation that weighs productivity and risk management, and then puts the tools in the hands of those best suited to use them long term. The bank hasn't said which risk drove the decision. Reports note that some traders were frustrated.

A reversal from July

  • In July, chief information officer Marco Argenti praised vibe coding by non-technical staff. The idea was that traders and bankers would build quick prototypes with AI and hand them to engineers to harden for production.
  • Earlier this year Goldman blocked Claude for Hong Kong bankers over concerns about confidential data leaving the firm through third-party AI services, according to Dealroom's summary. A search for that report points to April 2026.
  • Goldman has also built its own assistant that draws on models from OpenAI, Anthropic and Alphabet, per the same summary.

Where the reports disagree

Dealroom's summary says the tools are Claude Code and "Microsoft's GitHub". AI Weekly's headline says GitHub Copilot. We haven't seen the Bloomberg text, so we can't say which GitHub product is meant, and we haven't confirmed whether any replacement tool has been offered to the people who lost access.

What this means for teams buying coding assistants

  • Seat access is becoming a policy decision, not a default. A regulated firm that tried the tools widely has now sorted users by role.
  • The "prototype, then hand to engineers" model needs an owner. If non-engineers build tools, someone has to review the code, the data they touch and who maintains them.
  • Data handling is the sticking point to document. The Hong Kong block was about confidential data leaving the firm, so ask any vendor where prompts and code go before rollout.
PN
Priya Nair

AI Industry Reporter

Priya covers model releases, industry announcements, and the gap between what labs claim and what independent evaluators actually find. She reads the primary source - the paper, the system card, the benchmark org's own statement - before writing a word.